<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D200 for night photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/02/09/d200-for-night-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/02/09/d200-for-night-photography/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about night photography, desert ruins, 360 panoramas, and artistic inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:47:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoburner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dark frame noise reduction</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/02/09/d200-for-night-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoburner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dark frame noise reduction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=147#comment-230</guid>
		<description>[...] Andy Frazier a well known night photographer and Nocturnes member suggests an even longer duration, 5 or 6 minutes. And DPReview has reported no benefits on the Canon 40D with or without LENR for 30 second exposures. Joe Reifer has some tests on the Canon 5D where he suggests you have a problems around 8 minutes or so. And that noise becomes a problem on older Nikons around 3 minutes. But the 5D is older technology now, superseded by lower noise sensors and Nikons too have better sensors. Joe Reifer has some comments about the Nikon D200 here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andy Frazier a well known night photographer and Nocturnes member suggests an even longer duration, 5 or 6 minutes. And DPReview has reported no benefits on the Canon 40D with or without LENR for 30 second exposures. Joe Reifer has some tests on the Canon 5D where he suggests you have a problems around 8 minutes or so. And that noise becomes a problem on older Nikons around 3 minutes. But the 5D is older technology now, superseded by lower noise sensors and Nikons too have better sensors. Joe Reifer has some comments about the Nikon D200 here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Reifer - Words &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Night photography: 35mm digital &#38; medium format film</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/02/09/d200-for-night-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Reifer - Words &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Night photography: 35mm digital &#38; medium format film</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=147#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] minute exposure necessitates an additional 15 minutes for noise reduction to run. There are a few notable exceptions to the 1:1 exposure time to noise reduction ratio. Noise reduction can be performed in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] minute exposure necessitates an additional 15 minutes for noise reduction to run. There are a few notable exceptions to the 1:1 exposure time to noise reduction ratio. Noise reduction can be performed in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotoaficionado &#187; Archivo del weblog &#187; Larga exposición con la D200</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/02/09/d200-for-night-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>fotoaficionado &#187; Archivo del weblog &#187; Larga exposición con la D200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=147#comment-228</guid>
		<description>[...] Fuente: joereifer.com Enlace: Exposición de 4 horas con una D200 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente: joereifer.com Enlace: Exposición de 4 horas con una D200 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfong</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/02/09/d200-for-night-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>pfong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=147#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Thanks for highlighting Laura&#039;s work. Seeing something amazing like this is inspiring me to try something new with my camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for highlighting Laura&#8217;s work. Seeing something amazing like this is inspiring me to try something new with my camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/02/09/d200-for-night-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=147#comment-226</guid>
		<description>This news just in from a good friend who has done extensive long exposure testing with the Canon 1DS MkII and Nikon D200 side by side:

The higher resolution of the 1DS MkII makes a significant impact on thermal noise. 1DS MkII images with long exposure noise look much cleaner when downsampled to be on equal footing with the 10 megapixel Nikon D200. Of course downsampling the 1DSII files is mereley an exercise -- why throw away pixels unless you&#039;re only going to make small prints?

Noise analysis and camera comparisons are complex issues. Looking at long exposure night photographs from the D200 and 1DSII side by side at 100% view in Photoshop, my friend found the D200 files to be cleaner. He owns the 1DSII and was borrowing the D200 for the test. We&#039;re planning to compare the D200 with the Canon 5D at night when time allows.

Cheers,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This news just in from a good friend who has done extensive long exposure testing with the Canon 1DS MkII and Nikon D200 side by side:</p>
<p>The higher resolution of the 1DS MkII makes a significant impact on thermal noise. 1DS MkII images with long exposure noise look much cleaner when downsampled to be on equal footing with the 10 megapixel Nikon D200. Of course downsampling the 1DSII files is mereley an exercise &#8212; why throw away pixels unless you&#8217;re only going to make small prints?</p>
<p>Noise analysis and camera comparisons are complex issues. Looking at long exposure night photographs from the D200 and 1DSII side by side at 100% view in Photoshop, my friend found the D200 files to be cleaner. He owns the 1DSII and was borrowing the D200 for the test. We&#8217;re planning to compare the D200 with the Canon 5D at night when time allows.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

