<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full frame Canon wide angle update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/04/08/full-frame-canon-wide-angle-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/04/08/full-frame-canon-wide-angle-update/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about night photography, desert ruins, 360 panoramas, and artistic inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:47:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Reifer - Words &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Words: Best of 2007 part I</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/04/08/full-frame-canon-wide-angle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Reifer - Words &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Words: Best of 2007 part I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=205#comment-299</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon full frame digital SLR wide angle lens options [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon full frame digital SLR wide angle lens options [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/04/08/full-frame-canon-wide-angle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=205#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon,

Corner performance isn&#039;t as much of an issue on 1.6x sensor cameras. The &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-18-55mm-f-3.5-5.6-II-Lens-Review.aspx%22&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lens review&lt;/a&gt; on The Digital Picture is on point as usual.

Shooting at f/16 actually degrades sharpness due to diffraction. The optimum f-stop for most lenses is in the f/8 range. On the wide end of the 18-55, stopping down beyond f/11 for depth of field wouldn&#039;t usually be necessary.

Cheers,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>Corner performance isn&#8217;t as much of an issue on 1.6x sensor cameras. The <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-18-55mm-f-3.5-5.6-II-Lens-Review.aspx%22" rel="nofollow">lens review</a> on The Digital Picture is on point as usual.</p>
<p>Shooting at f/16 actually degrades sharpness due to diffraction. The optimum f-stop for most lenses is in the f/8 range. On the wide end of the 18-55, stopping down beyond f/11 for depth of field wouldn&#8217;t usually be necessary.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Haeber</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/04/08/full-frame-canon-wide-angle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Haeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=205#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Believe it or not, I&#039;ve enjoyed the 18-55 kit lens for the Digi-Reb. For the price it&#039;s an amazingly nice performing piece of glass. Downside: a loss of sharpness in the extremes of the f-stop range and minor distortion at it&#039;s 18mm focal length. I can put up with these, as I generally shoot about F/16 and can use post-processing distortion fixers in Photoshop to correct for distortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, I&#8217;ve enjoyed the 18-55 kit lens for the Digi-Reb. For the price it&#8217;s an amazingly nice performing piece of glass. Downside: a loss of sharpness in the extremes of the f-stop range and minor distortion at it&#8217;s 18mm focal length. I can put up with these, as I generally shoot about F/16 and can use post-processing distortion fixers in Photoshop to correct for distortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

