<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bombs over flowers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/12/13/bombs-over-flowers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/12/13/bombs-over-flowers/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about night photography, desert ruins, 360 panoramas, and artistic inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:47:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/12/13/bombs-over-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=376#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark -

Getting a night look with slightly underexposed slide film is much easier than digital. The post-processing strategy for digital night photography that&#039;s worked best for me is to shoot the same scene with film and digital, and then use the film as a reference. After doing this procedure a few times, digital night work becomes easier to tone appropriately.

I&#039;m planning to drum scan this image and print it after the holidays -- a print swap would be great -- I just have to ask, is your rotting &quot;Asparagus #2&quot; a post-modern answer to Edward Weston?

Cheers,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark -</p>
<p>Getting a night look with slightly underexposed slide film is much easier than digital. The post-processing strategy for digital night photography that&#8217;s worked best for me is to shoot the same scene with film and digital, and then use the film as a reference. After doing this procedure a few times, digital night work becomes easier to tone appropriately.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning to drum scan this image and print it after the holidays &#8212; a print swap would be great &#8212; I just have to ask, is your rotting &#8220;Asparagus #2&#8243; a post-modern answer to Edward Weston?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hobson</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2007/12/13/bombs-over-flowers/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=376#comment-548</guid>
		<description>I must say that while I was instantly attracted to S. Walsh&#039;s picture of the same locale, this one much more closely portrays what I know &#039;night&#039; to be. I appreciate that this picture seems more &#039;real&#039; even though the jet still has an element of the surreal/alien about it.

I could ramble on about the vapor trails, (I assume) star trails and other picture elements but I&#039;d rather just ask if you&#039;d be interested in a picture swap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that while I was instantly attracted to S. Walsh&#8217;s picture of the same locale, this one much more closely portrays what I know &#8216;night&#8217; to be. I appreciate that this picture seems more &#8216;real&#8217; even though the jet still has an element of the surreal/alien about it.</p>
<p>I could ramble on about the vapor trails, (I assume) star trails and other picture elements but I&#8217;d rather just ask if you&#8217;d be interested in a picture swap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

