Comments on: Feedburner on Facebook: Protecting Your Images On Another Channel http://www.joereifer.com/words/2008/09/22/feedburner-on-facebook-protecting-your-images-on-another-channel/ Ramblings about night photography, desert ruins, 360 panoramas, and artistic inspiration Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:15:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jay Watson http://www.joereifer.com/words/2008/09/22/feedburner-on-facebook-protecting-your-images-on-another-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-855 Jay Watson Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:34:21 +0000 http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=552#comment-855 Joe, Thanks for the link and follow up to this whole FB/WP/Feedburner set up. Looks pretty snazzy and do-able. I dig that Facebook Wordpress app. I am not so worried about the small thumbnail images that it posts on FB. However I hate the FB usage agreement. This has been on my mind since I started my group page. It is a real bummer. I would like to participate in some of the opportunities of social networking but stuff like this makes me very hesitant. YouTube is the same way. A watermark would offer no protection since they have the right to "copy, reformat, translate" (jack) my stuff. How about 100% black images on the group page? How uncool would a photo group look with no photos? You would think that with wording like "...and to grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing" that it would never catch on. Boy am I dumb. "Wu Tang is for the children!" Joe,
Thanks for the link and follow up to this whole FB/WP/Feedburner set up. Looks pretty snazzy and do-able. I dig that Facebook WordPress app. I am not so worried about the small thumbnail images that it posts on FB. However I hate the FB usage agreement.

This has been on my mind since I started my group page. It is a real bummer. I would like to participate in some of the opportunities of social networking but stuff like this makes me very hesitant. YouTube is the same way. A watermark would offer no protection since they have the right to “copy, reformat, translate” (jack) my stuff. How about 100% black images on the group page? How uncool would a photo group look with no photos?

You would think that with wording like “…and to grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing” that it would never catch on. Boy am I dumb.

“Wu Tang is for the children!”

]]>