<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film vs. Digital Night Photography: Interview with Troy Paiva of Lost America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joereifer.com/words/2009/10/26/film-vs-digital-night-photography-interview-with-troy-paiva-of-lost-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2009/10/26/film-vs-digital-night-photography-interview-with-troy-paiva-of-lost-america/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about night photography, desert ruins, 360 panoramas, and artistic inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2009/10/26/film-vs-digital-night-photography-interview-with-troy-paiva-of-lost-america/comment-page-1/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=2141#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>Set #1 — Business Coupe The digital version its much clearer  and sharper and with color painting and dusk falling it is very nice picture. The film exposure is like taken from the movie and with stars effect I can imagine movement so this one is for me:)

Like we can see at the Set #3 — Southbound Winnie digital version has quality within and this gives effect like this two pictures were captured long time before one another. On the film frame I like stars and there movement with North Star in the middle  I’ll go for both of them:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set #1 — Business Coupe The digital version its much clearer  and sharper and with color painting and dusk falling it is very nice picture. The film exposure is like taken from the movie and with stars effect I can imagine movement so this one is for me:)</p>
<p>Like we can see at the Set #3 — Southbound Winnie digital version has quality within and this gives effect like this two pictures were captured long time before one another. On the film frame I like stars and there movement with North Star in the middle  I’ll go for both of them:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-10-27</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2009/10/26/film-vs-digital-night-photography-interview-with-troy-paiva-of-lost-america/comment-page-1/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-10-27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=2141#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>[...] Film vs. Digital Night Photography: Interview with Troy Paiva of Lost America (Joe Reifer) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Film vs. Digital Night Photography: Interview with Troy Paiva of Lost America (Joe Reifer) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2009/10/26/film-vs-digital-night-photography-interview-with-troy-paiva-of-lost-america/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=2141#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>Great work guys! I did a 36 minute single frame digital exposure 2 weeks ago two days before the full moon with Lance that&#039;s gorgeous and noise free. I&#039;ve also done a number of 2 hour multiple frame exposures that require &quot;image stacking&quot; after the fact. The flexibility and quality of either approach is fantastic. Being able to check the light paining in a quick test shot before committing to the final is invaluable for light painting noobies like myself. Lance&#039;s upcoming book will have lots of details on these and other techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work guys! I did a 36 minute single frame digital exposure 2 weeks ago two days before the full moon with Lance that&#8217;s gorgeous and noise free. I&#8217;ve also done a number of 2 hour multiple frame exposures that require &#8220;image stacking&#8221; after the fact. The flexibility and quality of either approach is fantastic. Being able to check the light paining in a quick test shot before committing to the final is invaluable for light painting noobies like myself. Lance&#8217;s upcoming book will have lots of details on these and other techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2009/10/26/film-vs-digital-night-photography-interview-with-troy-paiva-of-lost-america/comment-page-1/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=2141#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>Great comparison you guys. I&#039;m in agreement with Troy, but wish that the green on the Galaxie in the digital version was kept off of the creosote bush. Natural flashlight on the bush would have separated the two a bit better. 
David- We are getting really close to being able to do 45 min digital exposures cleanly. The current full frame cameras- 5D mkII, and especially the new Nikons produce amazingly clean images, even more so when it&#039;s cold out. The recently released Beta version of LR3 shows marked improvement in noise reduction too. See the side by side comparison on Scott Martin&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.on-sight.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comparison you guys. I&#8217;m in agreement with Troy, but wish that the green on the Galaxie in the digital version was kept off of the creosote bush. Natural flashlight on the bush would have separated the two a bit better.<br />
David- We are getting really close to being able to do 45 min digital exposures cleanly. The current full frame cameras- 5D mkII, and especially the new Nikons produce amazingly clean images, even more so when it&#8217;s cold out. The recently released Beta version of LR3 shows marked improvement in noise reduction too. See the side by side comparison on Scott Martin&#8217;s <a href="http://www.on-sight.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.joereifer.com/words/2009/10/26/film-vs-digital-night-photography-interview-with-troy-paiva-of-lost-america/comment-page-1/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joereifer.com/words/?p=2141#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>This is great stuff you guys!  I am wondering what is going to change so that you can do 45 minute digital exposures??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great stuff you guys!  I am wondering what is going to change so that you can do 45 minute digital exposures??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

